Swimming inside the gut of the drywood termite Cryptotermes cavifrons is a remarkable
microorganism called Caduceia versatilis1.
C. cavifrons and C. versatilis share a symbiotic relationship – that is, a
partnership between two species from which both parties benefit in some way.
The tiny protists inside the intestines of the termite help it to digest wood2,
allowing it to absorb the products it needs, whilst it provides a food source
and habitat for the protists3.
What is so special about C.
versatilis? The answer lies in the way in which it moves through the gut of
the drywood termite. Looking through a microscope, it would appear at first
that the microbe propels itself forward by the wavelike motion of tail-like structures
called flagella, as is the case in many species of bacteria4.
In fact, the surface of the protist cell is lined with
thousands of even tinier rod-shaped bacteria called spirochetes. These bacteria
possess their own flagella, which rotate in perfect synchrony to create a wave
of movement that propels C. versatilis forward.
In other words, the protist is involved in another symbiotic relationship – the
rod-like bacteria on its surface actually allow it to move through the gut of C. Cavifrons4. This type of
symbiosis, in which bacteria confer the ability to move onto their partners,
is called motility symbiosis5.
Motility symbiosis is a rarely documented phenomenon; another of the few known examples of it is in a protist called
Mixotricha
paradoxa1. Yet, believe it or not, it could hold a clue to a
question upon which biologists today are still not agreed. Let’s take a look at
the cells of eukaryotes (animals, plants, fungi and protists).
Many eukaryotic cells have their
own flagellum-like tails, sometimes referred to as undulipodia as they differ somewhat in structure from the flagella
found on bacteria6. Undulipodia also include cilia, small hair-like
organelles which are found, for instance, in the windpipe of humans where they
beat back and forth to keep our airways clear of dirt and mucus7.
The whipping motion is driven by the action of special proteins inside undulipodia
called motor proteins8.
The question, then, is: how did undulipodia arise in the first place? Most
biologists believe that they evolved gradually from the flagella of prokaryotic
cells, their structures changing as they became more specialised and adapted to
the needs of eukaryotes. For example, undulipodia are considerably thicker than
bacterial flagella and move in a whipping fashion rather than a rotating one6,
which may be evolutionary adaptations to the bulkier size of eukaryotic cells:
undulipodia which propel cells forward, such as the ones found on sperm cells, must
be able to create a larger driving force in order to move a heavier cell.
This idea, known as autogeny6, is just one hypothesis, and
in 1970 a biologist called Lynn Margulis proposed a more radical one: that
somehow, undulipodia could have evolved from the symbiotic relationship of an
immotile cell with a type of flagellum-possessing bacterium called a spirochete. This is where we come back
to the idea of motility symbiosis: from the examples we have discussed above,
we already know that it is possible for a symbiotic relationship to exist in
which a bacterium confers motility onto another organism by effectively lodging
on the membrane and rotating its own flagella to drive both cells forward. Margulis
proposes that, at some point in evolutionary history, a spirochete and a
eukaryote somehow fused together to form a single cell with the first
undulipodium. This eukaryote, now having a competitive advantage over its peers
in that in can move independently, would have been favoured by natural
selection and hence undulipodia became widespread in eukaryotes.
This idea of endosymbiosis is
vastly different to autogeny, which proposes gradual evolutionary changes, but
Margulis argues her case strongly, claiming that undulipodia are more closely
related in structure to spirochetes than to ordinary flagella6. Most
biologists are sceptical about the origin of undulipodia by endosymbiosis due to
a lack of supporting evidence – for example, if undulipodia were once
free-living bacteria, why do they not contain their own DNA? – but Margulis’
hypothesis has not been rejected completely. Her appeal to existing cases of
motility symbiosis in today’s biosphere, such as that in C. Versatilis, as
evidence for endosymbiosis is perhaps a strong one – but, on the other hand, it
could be a mere coincidence. The origin of undulipodia could be one of those
great mysterious questions in science which will never be answered for
definite.
References
1 Biology of Termites: a Modern Synthesis – D. E. Bignell,
Y. Roisin, N. Lo (2011) – 15.7.3: Motility Symbiosis
2 Featured
Creatures: Cryptotermes cavifron –
A. S. Brammer, R. H. Scheffrahn, University of Florida (2002)
4 The Motility Symbiont of the Termite Gut Flagellate Caduceia versatilis Is a Member of the “Synergistes” Group – Y. Hongoh, T. Sato, M. F. Dolan, S. Noda, S. Ui, T. Kudo, M. Ohkuma (2007)
4 The Motility Symbiont of the Termite Gut Flagellate Caduceia versatilis Is a Member of the “Synergistes” Group – Y. Hongoh, T. Sato, M. F. Dolan, S. Noda, S. Ui, T. Kudo, M. Ohkuma (2007)
3 Termite Gut
Symbionts – W. v Egmond (2004)
5 A Dictionary of Genetics – R. C. King, W. D. Stanfield, P.
K. Mulligan (2007) – Motility Symbiosis
6 Doing Biology – J. Hagen, D. Allchin, F. Singer (1996) –
Chapter 3: Lynn Margulis and the Question of How Cells Evolved
7 Structure
and Function of Cilia – Ciliopathy Alliance
8 Life: The Science of Biology – B. Purves, D. Sadava, G.
Orians, C. Heller (2004) – Chapter 5: Cells: The Basic Units of Life
No comments:
Post a Comment